Vibe coding for legal educators, a working session presented by David Colarusso, Rebecca Fordon, and Jennifer Wondracek at CALIcon 2026.
Legal education innovation
Listen to David and Quinten on the LawDroid Manifesto podcast
David and Quinten appeared (separately) on the LawDroid Manifesto podcast recently to talk about innovation in legal education and access to justice.
Algos, bias, due process, & you
TL;DR: I built a bunch of highly-modular online simulations you can use with your students. They cover automation bias, the false positive paradox, competing definitions of fairness, disparate impact resulting from machine bias, and the value of due process. Most of them are self-explanatory and can be used on their own. However, the first one intentionally lacks in-simulation context, and I think linking them together creates a more-compelling narrative arc. Play with the links above in isolation, or join me for the guided tour.
How to write an academic paper in AI and Law
In case you, too, are a practitioner in law and you would like to participate in an AI and law conference or a workshop associated with the main conference (like our series of AI for Access to Justice workshops), I thought it might be helpful to explain what I have learned about how to succeed in this space.
The LIT Lab is awarded Suffolk’s first patent*
The invention scores free-response questions given the text of answers AND NOTHING MORE. That's right—it can "grade" essays based on the text of answers without a model answer or any external context, and it does NOT use an LLM.